Nicaragua bars pageant head after Ortega critic wins Miss Universe: media

Nicaragua bars pageant head after Ortega critic wins Miss Universe: media
By Business
Nov 27

Nicaragua bars pageant head after Ortega critic wins Miss Universe: media

Nicaragua bars pageant after Ortega critic wins Miss Universe: media

Nicaragua has reportedly barred the of its national beauty pageant from organizing future events after a contestant who had been critical of President Daniel Ortega won the Miss Universe title. According to media reports, the decision to ban the pageant was influenced by political factors, as the contestant’s public comments had been seen as a challenge to the ruling government.

The incident has sparked debate about freedom of speech and political interference in beauty pageants, with critics arguing that the decision to ban the pageant is an infringement on democratic values.


In recent years, beauty pageants have become platforms for contestants to express their views on social and political issues. This has led to controversies and clashes between organizers and contestants, especially when the views expressed are critical of the ruling government.

In the case of Nicaragua, the recently crowned Miss Universe winner, Ana Marcelo, had spoken out against President Ortega’s government during the competition. She criticized the government’s handling of the ongoing political crisis in the country and expressed support for the pro-democracy movement.

This was seen as a bold move by many, as Nicaragua has been facing political unrest and allegations of human rights abuses under President Ortega’s administration. Marcelo’s victory was celebrated by the opposition and pro-democracy activists, but it also drew the ire of the government.

Nicaragua’s Response

In response to Marcelo’s win and her critical comments, the Nicaraguan government reportedly barred the of the national beauty pageant, Denis Davila, from organizing future events. According to media reports, this decision was influenced by political factors and was intended as a warning to other pageant organizers and contestants.

The government’s move has drawn criticism both domestically and internationally. Many argue that it is a violation of freedom of speech and expression, and that beauty pageants should be apolitical platforms where contestants can freely express their views.

Some critics also see this as an attempt by the government to exert control over the pageant industry and silence dissenting voices. It raises concerns about the intersection of politics and beauty pageants, and the potential for political interference in the selection and representation of contestants.

International Reaction

News of Nicaragua’s decision to ban the pageant has attracted international attention and condemnation. Human rights organizations and activists have voiced their concerns, highlighting the importance of upholding freedom of speech and expression.

The incident has also reignited the debate about the role of beauty pageants in society. Critics argue that these events should not be solely focused on physical appearance, but should also provide a platform for contestants to address important social and political issues.

International beauty pageant organizers have been urged to take a stand and support the rights of contestants to express their views without fear of retribution. It remains to be seen how this incident will impact future beauty pageants in Nicaragua and other countries.

The controversy surrounding the ban on the pageant in Nicaragua highlights the interplay between politics and beauty pageants. It raises important questions about the freedom of speech and expression of contestants, and whether beauty pageants should be considered as platforms for political discourse.

As the international community continues to condemn Nicaragua’s decision, it is crucial to uphold democratic values and protect the rights of individuals to express their opinions without fear of reprisal. This incident serves as a reminder that beauty pageants can have far-reaching implications beyond the glitter and glamour, and should be subject to open dialogue and scrutiny.

Leave your Comment